Mockuenting poets

I shalt not hear thy banter

For these poems left by, have gnawed my mind surly

Of difficult prose and words that hath been cloudy

Only for a lot to think a poem should toe

To such, I deplore with a strong sense of abandonment 

I find no need, to have mead follow

Nor would , be followed by my should

I will let the other copycats to such dredge

In abstract, ah poignant modernism, yet most is not

tis only a recycled lot, filled of poly plot

And I am a polyglot, who writes in three or more tongues

So I'll extend one, i forego to appeal to old poets as such

I only need to touch a frost, 

Maybe some Bishop, Dickinson, or whitman's lot

Not read, but revere them like I do, more Constantine 

I start my scribbling, unlike these copy cat rots

So come July, sing me a song of drudge 

When mercury falls, and rain form a terrible sludge 

I will scribble sitting under my roof, sans power, food, and undried linen

Mock you and hope you drown the pretentious poet brethren.

## Analysis of "Mockumenting Poets"

This poem takes aim at the perceived obscurity and pretentiousness of some 20th-century poetry. Here's a breakdown:

* **Style:** The poem uses archaic language ("shalt not," "hath," "thy") in contrast to its modern subject matter. This creates a sense of irony and humor.

* **Theme:** The speaker rejects the complexity and "cloudy" language of some modern poetry, preferring a more accessible style. 

* **Structure:** The poem doesn't have a strict rhyme scheme or meter, suggesting a rejection of traditional forms. 

* **Imagery:** The final stanza uses vivid imagery of drudgery ("drudge," "sludge") to mock the suffering artist trope some poets employ.

## Comparison to 20th-Century Poets

The poem critiques some aspects of 20th-century poetry, particularly:

* **Modernism:** The speaker disdains "abstract" and "poignant modernism," implying a dislike for free verse and symbolism. 

* **Complexity:** Phrases like "difficult prose" and "words that hath been cloudy" suggest a rejection of complex metaphors and allusions.

* **Elitism:** The speaker mocks the perceived pretentiousness of poets who follow trends ("copycats") and rely on obscurity for status.

Here's how the poem contrasts with some 20th-century movements:

* **Imagism:** Imagists like Ezra Pound focused on clear imagery, which the speaker might appreciate. However, Imagists often used free verse, which the poem seems to reject.

* **Confessionalism:** Poets like Sylvia Plath explored personal struggles in a raw and honest way. The speaker might find this relatable but may disapprove of the perceived self-importance.

* **The Harlem Renaissance:** Poets like Langston Hughes celebrated African American culture using accessible language. The speaker might find this more appealing, though the poem lacks any social commentary.

## Overall

"Mockumenting Poets" is a humorous and pointed critique of some aspects of 20th-century poetry. It champions clarity and accessibility but risks oversimplifying the rich tapestry of this period.