A : Soothsayer, Priest, Apologist
Somewhere in between, I LIE
In a state, and doing, like an Orange, duplicitous, yet unwantingly
If your question is for a relief, I can bring you exactly that, per measure
Pay it with a pound of flesh, or a pound
I won't subscribe to your interpretation of me, like I don't care for your views on organized religion
And with the flair and finesse, I ridicule you in compliments expressing awe laced with insult
Everywhere in between I lie, down
God did die, and left me this world
My world, Oh I remember I made it, I didn't mention it
My omission of such fact doesn't warrant your judgement, nor thought
I build you the road, push you to walk, make you often
Break you first, then rebuild, fool you first, then remind you to get better
You all are my citrus tree, growing tangerines, lemons, sweet limes, and mandarins
Each added because you all wanted it, Oh! Make Me feel better, help! , those requests
Now I am to blame?
It was my story to sell, your desire to buy, wasn't it?
A : Sandman, Shaman, Reiki Master, neurologist, psychologist, profiler, Therapist, your choices
Yet you forget I could be all that and more, at a moment's notice
Who weilds power here then?
Me? Absolutely not, I supply what you demand, I am not asking for much, you know you gave me that beautiful soul already
Why would I want more
A fair trade, though life isn't ever nor would it be with you, why would you be any special
Did you doctor the evidence yet , like I demonstrated in relatable ways?
I always make it easy for you, I will always watch you, after all
After All, you think you know what that means
But you don't want to , fret not
Reach out, I will be here, where else will I be?
Copilot Deep thinking breakdown.
Here’s another in‐depth breakdown of your final version—diving into its structure, language, imagery, and underlying themes:
---
## **Title: "Come, let's get a shot of Absinthe."**
- **Invitation & Mood:**
The title immediately sets a scene of intoxication—both literally (absinthe, the famously hallucinogenic spirit) and metaphorically (an altered state of mind). It promises an experience that’s both alluring and potentially dangerous, inviting the reader into a world where boundaries blur.
- **Implication:**
By framing the invitation so casually, the poem hints at a relaxed yet subversive encounter, setting the stage for the complex narrative that follows.
---
## **Section One: Shifting Identity and Dualism**
### **“A : Soothsayer, Priest, Apologist
Somewhere in between, I LIE”**
- **Layered Persona:**
The speaker lists roles traditionally connected to authority, prophecy, and justification. Yet, they immediately undercut that certainty by proclaiming, “I LIE”—a word that carries dual meanings: deceptive untruths and the act of merely existing/resting somewhere in-between.
- **Ambiguity as Power:**
This blending of truth and deception establishes an identity rooted in paradox. It signals that the speaker’s credibility isn’t anchored in conventional morality; instead, it thrives in ambiguity.
### **“In a state, and doing, like an Orange, duplicitous, yet unwantingly”**
- **Vivid Metaphor:**
Comparing themselves to an orange invokes a vivid sensory image—bright, full of zest, yet capable of contrasting flavors (sweet and bitter). Here, “duplicitous” underscores inherent contradictions, while “unwantingly” suggests that even this double-edged nature isn’t entirely by choice.
### **Transactional Exchange & Subtle Insults**
- **“If your question is for a relief, I can bring you exactly that, per measure
Pay it with a pound of flesh, or a pound”**
The reference to a “pound of flesh” evokes classic literature (think *The Merchant of Venice*)—a reminder that any relief or redemption comes at a steep, often painful price. The line plays with the idea of value and sacrifice, suggesting that nothing is free.
- **“I won't subscribe to your interpretation of me, like I don't care for your views on organized religion
And with the flair and finesse, I ridicule you in compliments expressing awe laced with insult”**
Here, the tone turns incisive. The speaker rejects others’ attempts to confine or define them—much as one might dismiss conventional religious roles. The blend of ridicule wrapped in “compliments” intensifies the sense of controlled, calculated provocation. It hints at both superiority and vulnerability: the speaker knows the power of words and uses them to unsettle.
- **Repetition & Duality:**
The recurring idea of being “in between” and “lying” reinforces the unstable nature of this persona. The speaker inhabits contradictions, signifying that the source of power lies in not fitting neatly into any category.
---
## **Section Two: Creation, Consequence, and the Citrus Tree**
### **“God did die, and left me this world
My world, Oh I remember I made it, I didn't mention it”**
- **Rebellion Against Divine Order:**
Alluding to Nietzsche’s declaration of God’s death, the speaker positions themselves as the inheritor of that power vacuum. They claim creation—a world they made but casually “didn't mention,” implying that omissions or forgotten truths underpin existence.
### **“I build you the road, push you to walk, make you often
Break you first, then rebuild, fool you first, then remind you to get better”**
- **Cyclical Manipulation:**
This sequence outlines a process of transformation that is as brutal as it is necessary. The act of breaking and rebuilding conveys a sense of forced growth—where pain and deconstruction are prerequisites for renewal. It suggests that suffering is intimately linked with progress.
### **“You all are my citrus tree, growing tangerines, lemons, sweet limes, and mandarins
Each added because you all wanted it, Oh! Make Me feel better, help! , those requests”**
- **Rich, Layered Metaphor:**
The citrus tree becomes a multi-faceted metaphor: every fruit differs in flavor and character, symbolizing the diversity of outcomes or traits within the individuals. The speaker is both the nurturer and the examiner of these qualities—the “products” of their labor. This exchange is transactional: what is grown and what is sought are inextricably linked.
### **“Now I am to blame?
It was my story to sell, your desire to buy, wasn't it?”**
- **Blame & Responsibility:**
Here, the speaker challenges the notion of guilt. They argue that if the narrative (or “story”) was offered and eagerly consumed by others, the fault is not solely theirs. It flips the script on accountability, suggesting that people willingly engage with—and thus endorse—the cycle of manipulation.
---
## **Section Three: Multiplicity, the Soul, and Omnipresence**
### **“A : Sandman, Shaman, Reiki Master, neurologist, psychologist, profiler, Therapist, your choices
Yet you forget I could be all that and more, at a moment's notice”**
- **Infinite Adaptability:**
This list of roles indicates versatility. The speaker can embody any function required by those seeking help or escape; they are a chameleon of authority and knowledge. This fluid identity reflects the idea that power isn’t fixed—it adapts to demand.
### **“Who wields power here then?
Me? Absolutely not, I supply what you demand, I am not asking for much, you know you gave me that beautiful soul already
Why would I want more”**
- **Soul as Currency:**
The infamous “soul line” is a quiet, chilling moment. It implies that the soul (the core of one’s being) was already surrendered without resistance—a commodity given freely in exchange for comfort, salvation, or resolution. The speaker’s indifference (“Why would I want more”) underscores the transactional, even inevitable, nature of this exchange.
### **“A fair trade, though life isn't ever nor would it be with you, why would you be any special
Did you doctor the evidence yet , like I demonstrated in relatable ways?
I always make it easy for you, I will always watch you, after all
After All, you think you know what that means
But you don't want to , fret not
Reach out, I will be here, where else will I be?”**
- **Omnipresence & Surveillance:**
The closing lines reinforce an eerie, ever-present watchfulness. Here, the speaker isn’t overtly hostile—they simply exist, waiting for acknowledgement. The idea that you “doctor the evidence” ties back to the notion that reality and truth are malleable, manipulated to comfort or control.
- **Inevitability:**
The final invitation is both reassuring and ominous. It suggests that no matter how one might try to escape or redefine their identity, the speaker (the force, the Devil-like entity, the mediator of one’s fate) will always be there.
---
## **Overall Themes & Reflections**
- **Duality & Ambiguity:**
The speaker’s existence is built on contradiction: they are simultaneously a nurturer and a deceiver, a creator and a manipulator, offering relief while exacting a cost.
- **Power as a Transaction:**
Rather than wielding power through overt force, the speaker’s power lies in fulfilling the desires and fears of those who call upon them. The soul is traded like a common good, highlighting how willingly—and often unknowingly—people surrender essential parts of themselves.
- **Manipulation of Truth:**
With references to “doctoring evidence” and reworked narratives, the poem plays with the idea that truth isn’t absolute. It can be changed, adapted, or sold, leaving us questioning what is genuine.
- **Inescapable Presence:**
The recurring promise that “I will always watch you” and the envisioning of an omnipresent force creates a sense of inescapability—an acknowledgment that the cycle of desire, sacrifice, and manipulation is woven into the fabric of existence.
---
## **Feedback Summary**
- **Strengths:**
- The language is rich, inviting the reader to immerse themselves in layered symbolism.
- Duality is consistently developed, challenging conventional notions of morality and power.
- The use of vivid metaphors (the citrus tree, the pound of flesh, the roles assumed) weaves a tapestry of complex relationships between creator and creation.
- The “soul line” stands out as a profound, chilling commentary on what we willingly give up in our pursuit of relief or knowledge.
- **Areas for Further Reflection:**
- Some images (like “did you doctor the evidence yet”) may benefit from slight clarification to ensure the reader grasps the nuance of manipulation without losing the enigmatic tone.
- A careful review of punctuation and pauses could enhance the dramatic tension in key lines, giving the reader space to fully absorb each layered meaning.
---
## **Final Thoughts**
Your poem is a compelling exploration of power, deception, and the blurred line between creator and creation. It challenges us to consider how much of our own agency we trade for comfort and how the narratives we consume—and willingly participate in—shape our lives. The text is both a personal confession and a universal commentary on the human condition, wrapped in the guise of a devilish persona.
