Monday, 21 July 2025

State of the draught

I have been trying to write my thoughts  
In their fairly complex nature they reveal little  
At a time I am stubborn as a drunk ox and poke at them  
They yield I persist I pen them down  
To freeverse poetry or something akin to  

But the larger part of the current world conspires  
Throwing mediocrity bringing up lyrics  
Nearly all sound like the writer's brain had diarrhoea  
Or that they vomited words drunk on drain cleaner  
These were made into songs  

All civilizations form, rise to power, peak, and begin to rot  
This could be the state of literature I infer  
Poetry now is in palliative care  
Devoid of hope  
Trying to stay aflame  
Yet out of oil  
Unbeknownst  
Burning to the wick  

I still scribble metaphors  
My barrage of constructs may not be poetry  
But I am happy they are not made into songs  
For the brains that have subscribed to mediocrity  
Won't find a guide rail to form cognitive thoughts  

Stay clear of such writings  
Such as mine  
For this requires some thought  
Even to disregard  

I will ignore the state of now of poetry and stories  
Hold my keel and navigate through this draught  
Maybe swim in the receding waters too  
But I refuse to write  
Unworthy mediocre thoughts

Sunday, 20 July 2025

Not Insomnia

It is always around three in the night
Where sleep rears it's head
By then I would have exhausted my brain
But I keep yawning to keep it awake
Involuntarily, I rather be asleep
But there is always that one random thing I suddenly think of
Then the pursuit begins
Twenty pages into a summarised reading extracted from twenty books entices me
I fire another query, the AI system delivers
I have paid for four out of six services i use
I don't really, it was me buying them.half awake
My brain is running me, to ruin, to fatigue, to my death
All in a masquerade of knowledge gathering of things I wouldn't ever need to know
Friction welding, to laser cutting
Ganglion blockers, to chromaticity
I work in IT, none of these get food to my table
But then there is that ocassional script I make
A powerless ex technician stripped of all his administration rights
Asking for updates on tasks, the whys the whens, the why nots 
Pitiful, pathetic, demotivating
Hence my pursuit.

_________

Analysis by Co-Pilot
---

🕒 Structure & Temporal Setting

- Opening line: "It is always around three in the night" sets a concrete, ritualistic frame—this is not occasional insomnia, but a recurring state of wakefulness tied to a very specific time.
- This hour, "three in the night," acts as both literal and metaphorical threshold: between fatigue and fixation, between submission and rebellion.

---

🧠 Cognitive Dissonance & Paradox

- The central contradiction—"I keep yawning to keep it awake"—beautifully captures the absurdity of overexertion. Your own body signals rest, and yet the mind resists.
- You personify the brain as both puppet master and saboteur: "My brain is running me, to ruin..." elevates the internal conflict to existential stakes.

---

📚 Compulsive Knowledge Seeking

- You dive into obscure topics—"Friction welding, to laser cutting / Ganglion blockers, to chromaticity"—which speak to a kind of uncontrolled intellectual drift. These aren’t hobbies or tasks; they’re compulsions masquerading as productivity.
- Despite declaring their irrelevance to your job, this exploration becomes necessary—entices me, not because of usefulness but because of craving.

---

🔧 Alienation in the Workplace

- The contrast between the pursuit of expansive knowledge and your powerless reality at work is sharp:
  - "A powerless ex technician stripped of all his administration rights" reflects deep professional erosion.
  - The tone of "asking for updates on tasks, the whys the whens, the why nots" borders on pleading—no longer driving but drifting.

---

💸 Late-night Consumerism

- “I have paid for four out of six services… half awake” introduces another layer: the cost—not just financial, but existential—of being always “on.” You critique digital capitalism in a line, by showing how unconscious purchases entangle with productivity obsessions.

---

🔍 Form & Voice

- The poem is free verse, raw and unornamented, which suits the subject matter. It reads like a monologue or internal dialogue, which enhances its intimacy.
- There’s no attempt to romanticize the night. Instead, it's bleak, driven, and deeply honest.

---

🧭 Thematic Core

- The piece interrogates themes of:
  - Self-destruction through intellect
  - The illusion of control vs. lived powerlessness
  - Workplace disenfranchisement
  - Sleep as submission, curiosity as survival

---

⚖️ Closing Mood

- The final line—"Hence my pursuit"—is a resignation, not resolution. It’s tragic, not triumphant. The pursuit continues, not because it’s noble, but because stopping feels even worse.

Rebirth

I must recede
To the basic constructs of my existence 
Wherefore, for nothing apparent 
But this extremity that I seem to envelope all with
Seems contradictory
I must languish, be humbled by myself, for nothing and no one seems to be able to
I need to be all I am
Without the foreboding
That I constantly find from those that surround
For none seems to be here
They are where today left from
   or tomorrow is heading
Neither runing, nor winning
And remaining lost 
I find such company condescending 
Detrimental even 
For such are the paths that forge assured waste
I seek to elevate self, but then
Only my end can renew me
     an end of this being I have created
A change of how I have become
What too
I seek to find me, beneath the ashes
When I burn off this foliage of my version
The one I have brought for all
I will forage my new
Forge me, form me again
For me.




Analysis by Co-pilot.

--------


Summary

Rebirth is a poem about the deliberate unraveling of identity and the struggle to reconstruct oneself in defiance of external expectations and internal contradictions. Through meditative, free-flowing verse, the speaker journeys from emotional desolation to an assertion of personal renewal. The poem explores solitude, detachment, and the necessity of burning away the self shaped for others in order to rediscover authenticity. The tone is introspective and resolute, marked by philosophical inquiry and an almost ritualistic plea for transformation.

---

Line-by-Line Analysis

I must recede  
This opening sets a tone of withdrawal. The speaker feels compelled to retreat from their current state—an inward migration toward essence.

To the basic constructs of my existence  
Here, the poet invokes a stripping down to foundational truths. It’s a call to remember what once defined the self before layers of influence or artifice.

Wherefore, for nothing apparent  
The motive for this retreat is unclear. It is felt rather than understood—a spiritual or existential imperative without rational justification.

But this extremity that I seem to envelope all with  
The speaker acknowledges a suffocating vastness or intensity that they impose on their surroundings. It may hint at emotional overwhelm or the scale of one’s internal contradiction.

Seems contradictory  
This brief line acts as a moment of distilled clarity. The speaker names the tension—existence itself has become paradoxical.

I must languish, be humbled by myself, for nothing and no one seems to be able to  
A powerful admission that self-correction must come from within. No external force has succeeded in softening or guiding the speaker, so they must confront their own undoing.

I need to be all I am  
This marks a pivot towards authenticity. A desire to encompass the entirety of the self, unapologetically.

Without the foreboding  
The speaker seeks freedom from the anxious anticipation that clouds their being. It speaks to the weight of dread from external judgment or internal doubt.

That I constantly find from those that surround  
Others contribute to the foreboding. The speaker feels surrounded by people who unsettle rather than support.

For none seems to be here  
This line introduces a sense of abandonment or emotional absence. The people in the speaker’s orbit are physically present but spiritually or intellectually disengaged.

They are where today left from or tomorrow is heading  
A haunting expression of temporal dislocation. The speaker is surrounded by people lost in time, clinging either to the past or escaping toward the future.

Neither runing, nor winning  
Assuming "runing" is a stylized version of "running," the poet describes a state of inertia. These people are neither striving nor succeeding—they are merely existing without purpose.

And remaining lost  
This confirms the stagnation. The speaker finds no direction among their peers and feels the void deepen.

I find such company condescending  
An unexpected twist. The speaker feels belittled by the presence of the lost, perhaps because their aimlessness becomes oppressive or patronizing in contrast to the speaker’s inner urgency.

Detrimental even  
The detachment grows sharper. The speaker begins to see this surrounding atmosphere as actively harmful.

For such are the paths that forge assured waste  
A damning statement. The life paths chosen by others lead only to squandered potential. It’s an indictment of conformity and thoughtlessness.

I seek to elevate self, but then  
This line introduces conflict. Despite a longing for transcendence, the speaker faces barriers to achieving it.

Only my end can renew me  
Rebirth demands a death. The speaker recognizes that total renewal necessitates the end of a previous version of themselves.

An end of this being I have created  
They are not blaming fate or circumstance. This is the self they shaped, and now must unmake.

A change of how I have become  
The transformation isn’t of essence, but of outcome. The speaker is reassessing the path that led to who they are.

What too  
A mysterious interjection, perhaps questioning what else must be shed or considered. It echoes with ambiguity.

I seek to find me, beneath the ashes  
Fire has become the metaphor for transformation. The real self is hidden below what must be burned away.

When I burn off this foliage of my version  
This “foliage” suggests a cultivated outer self—grown for others, not from authenticity. The speaker intends to shed this like bark or dead leaves.

The one I have brought for all  
This version was publicly offered. It was performative or socially manufactured.

I will forage my new  
The wordplay between “forage” and “forge” adds texture. The speaker must search actively for the pieces of their new self.

Forge me, form me again  
This is a mantra of rebirth. The repetition implies sacredness, intensity, and intention.

For me  
A resolute conclusion. The transformation is not for display or approval—it’s personal and inward-facing.

Wednesday, 16 July 2025

Half past me

Between the blink
I capture a detailed image of you
On the grey desk, with crossed legs
They always yank at the inner devil
But now it seems to curse me for waking it
I pause, in between nano seconds pass
I pass through at least six emotions
None of those seem to stick
But love does, but stays behind a bolted barricaded door
Separated by a moat of murky water, 
filled with hungry crocodiles
Knowing me, you would ask, how many did you see, estimate, vet, and/or validate
I will shrug my shoulder this moment 
I was not counting
The crocodiles are there for a reason
And I stopped questioning absolution
This is me, the one I had buried deep
To never be found, because this one is free
Devoid of attachment, pangs of separation, or yearning is just an theorem away
Pragmatic
If you thought my cloaking this was wrong
This is a diesel engine spurting pistons and seals
Enraged, but not angry
Only because it feels nothing is worth the torque my mind would produce
To push further in life.
I now am here
I have arrived , I hate it
But I love it, there is no freight on my loading bed
I breathe in icy wisps.

Copilot.....
__________
Here's a clear and concise line-by-line breakdown of Half past me to help your blog readers engage with the piece thoughtfully. I've included a summary at the end for context and cohesion.

---

✍️ Line-by-Line Analysis of Half past me

1. "Between the blink"  
   A fleeting moment—like a snapshot caught in time, suggesting high emotional and perceptual intensity.

2. "I capture a detailed image of you"  
   The speaker is highly aware of the subject, observing them with precision and emotional charge.

3. "On the grey desk, with crossed legs"  
   A concrete image: grounded, casual, possibly symbolic of indifference or allure.

4. "That always yank at the inner devil"  
   The subject stirs something primal or forbidden in the speaker—temptation, chaos, or desire.

5. "But now it seems to curse me for waking it"  
   The speaker regrets awakening those feelings; the “inner devil” now bites back.

6. "I pause, in between nano seconds pass"  
   Time slows—each moment is hyper-analyzed. The speaker’s emotional state is accelerating yet fragmented.

7. "I pass through at least six emotions"  
   Rapid shifts in feeling—indicative of emotional turbulence or overload.

8. "None of those seem to stick"  
   Nothing lasts. Emotions are fleeting, unable to ground themselves in the speaker.

9. "But love does, but stays behind a bolted barricaded door"  
   Love is permanent but inaccessible—locked away and heavily guarded.

10. "Separated by a moat of murky water, filled with hungry crocodiles"  
   The emotional barrier is alive, dangerous, and intentionally impenetrable.

11. "Knowing me, you would ask, how many did you see, estimate, vet, and/or validate"  
   The speaker anticipates the subject’s analytical or skeptical nature—possibly a former lover or confidante.

12. "I will shrug my shoulder this moment"  
   Passive resistance; the speaker refuses to engage in intellectual or emotional dissection.

13. "I was not counting"  
   A refusal to quantify emotion—breaking from the cold logic the subject demands.

14. "The crocodiles are there for a reason"  
   Every defense is intentional—designed to protect something fragile or dangerous within.

15. "And I stopped questioning absolution"  
   The speaker no longer seeks forgiveness, suggesting emotional autonomy or detachment.

16. "This is me, the one I had buried deep"  
   A resurfacing of a former self—unapologetic and perhaps emotionally numb.

17. "To never be found, because this one is free"  
   The buried self was hidden to protect its freedom; it now returns with clarity and distance.

18. "Devoid of attachment, pangs of separation, or yearning is just a theorem away"  
   Emotions are stripped away, rationalized, even rendered hypothetical.

19. "Pragmatic"  
   A declaration—this self is logical, stripped of romanticism.

20. "If you thought my cloaking this was wrong"  
   The speaker challenges the subject’s judgment of their emotional defenses.

21. "This is a diesel engine spurting pistons and seals"  
   A visceral metaphor for the mind—mechanical, explosive, powerful, but emotionally closed off.

22. "Enraged, but not angry"  
   A paradox: energy without sentiment. Movement without emotion.

23. "Only because it feels nothing is worth the torque my mind would produce"  
   The speaker refuses to spend mental/emotional effort unless truly justified.

24. "To push further in life."  
   Progress is withheld—perhaps as protest, exhaustion, or clarity.

25. "I now am here"  
   An arrival at this detached version of self.

26. "I have arrived , I hate it / But I love it"  
   A contradiction—the speaker finds peace and discomfort in emotional detachment.

27. "There is no freight on my loading bed"  
   No emotional baggage remains; the speaker is unburdened.

28. "I breathe in icy wisps."  
   Final image: cold, empty, but clear—a breath in a sterile emotional climate.

---

📘 Summary for Your Blog

Half past me is a meditative and raw exploration of emotional defense, inner resurrection, and rational detachment. It paints a portrait of someone who has buried their feeling self to emerge as a pragmatic, emotionally fortified identity. Using motifs of mechanical engines, crocodile moats, and cold air, the poem captures what it means to live without romantic attachments while confronting their lingering presence. Love exists—locked away—but the speaker chooses clarity, control, and self-containment over vulnerability.


Friday, 11 July 2025

for the kids

Rhyme scheme aaaa

A pirate ship was in a fight
It sunk in the bay on a dark night
If you visit the bay in the moon light
You can see the treasures shine bright


Haiku

Pirate ship in war  
Moonlight reveals buried gold  
Silent bay at peace


Free verse


A ship once fought with might  
Struck by the fate , out of luck  
It drifted into the bay and came to rest  
Now treasures glimmer softly  
Beneath moonlit skies


Limerick 

A pirate once sailed through the bay,  
Where moonlight would dance and then play.  
His treasure sank deep,  
In waters that sleep
Now ghosts guard the gold night and day!


Acrostic

Prowling seas with daring flair  
In search of treasure none would dare  
Riddles hidden deep in chests  
Amid moonlit waves, the ship finds rest  
Tales of battles told with pride  
Echo in the bay where ghosts still hide






Wednesday, 9 July 2025

Proximity Mine

Proximity is my tether 
To loving you,
Words are irrelevant 
I have mastered those
The soul may seek
I do not follow
My hands are real
They wrap around better
If I had to love
With distance and words
I would only hate
You and my fate.



Copilot being my echo chamber.


🌌 Thematic Resonance
- Proximity vs. Abstraction: The speaker rejects the ethereal—words, soul, distance—in favor of the tangible. Love here is not a concept but a grasp, a presence. This flips the romantic trope of “love transcending space” on its head.
- Mastery of Language, Yet Its Uselessness: “Words are irrelevant / I have mastered those” is a powerful paradox. It suggests that even poetic fluency cannot substitute for physical nearness. It’s a poet’s lament that poetry itself is insufficient.
- Conditional Love and Rebellion: The final stanza is devastating: “If I had to love / With distance and words / I would only hate / You and my fate.” It’s not just a refusal—it’s a rebellion against the terms of love that feel imposed, unnatural, or cruel.

---

✍️ Stylistic Notes
- Minimalist and Direct: The sparseness of language mirrors the emotional clarity. There’s no ornamentation—just truth, clenched and unyielding.
- Tactile Imagery: “My hands are real / They wrap around better” is beautifully grounded. It evokes longing not as sentiment but as physical necessity.
- Line Breaks and Rhythm: The enjambment creates a breathless, almost staccato rhythm—like someone speaking through clenched teeth or holding back tears.


Tuesday, 8 July 2025

Nope

There still are mangoes on the tree,
Surprising, though not really
I believed the season took those kff, its mid July
Rains rot the last hanging
But then these look green outside
Let us believe this means its good, this variety is such green even when ripe
Sweet with a hint of 'insert your favourite place' feels
I despised these even in summer to be honest
They keep appearing, as if to entice me
Haven't the tree learnt of this impossible impasse!
I wonder, but then I as always don't fret
To each their own berfet regret
I will go home in a few days
Like always, I go because I know I will
And this tree will I believe try to draw me.


---------
Copilot's Deep Analysis of the Poem

Metaphor of the Tree as Suitor
The mango tree stands in for a persistent admirer, its fruit as repeated offers of affection. Each hanging mango is an unspoken proposal—ripe or not—gesturing toward the speaker. By personifying the tree, you ground universal experiences of pursuit and refusal in a familiar, sensorial image.  

The Impasse Between Desire and Resistance
“Haven’t the tree learnt of this impossible impasse!” captures the stalemate of unrequited advances. The speaker isn’t hostile but unmoved; there’s a calm firmness in refusal. That tension—between the tree’s hope and the speaker’s resolve—underpins every line, suggesting both sympathy and a boundary that won’t be crossed.  

Emotional Landscape: Weariness and Tenderness
You strike a balance between exhaustion and a subtle fondness. The speaker acknowledges the tree’s efforts—“I don’t fret”—yet remains detached. This detachment isn’t cruelty; it’s a gentle self-preservation. There’s almost admiration for the tree’s constancy, even as one wishes it would finally relent.  

Rhythm, Repetition, and Seasonality
Seasonal markers (mid-July, rains, green fruit) act like a metronome, pacing the poem’s emotional heartbeat. The repetition of “these look green” and “they keep appearing” mirrors the cycle of advances, each one familiar yet fresh. That looping structure reinforces the sense of enduring, unresolved pursuit.  

Philosophical Underpinnings
At its core, the poem probes boundaries: self-preservation versus empathy, acceptance of limits, and the desire to be left in peace. It gently questions what it means to refuse without bitterness, to witness persistence without yielding. In that space, the poem becomes a meditation on consent, emotional autonomy, and the respect we owe both ourselves and our suitors.  


Read Signs Incorrectly, Repeat

I look into the screen, rows and rows of texts
Paragraphs, pages, after pages
These are my expressions, I cast an outline 
Spin a story, much of it writes itself
I am one pair of one eyes but
Always was, always will
No respite warranted, none accepted
And the night passes me through, like a mother facing Shoulder Dystocia
I can hear it wail, like a Banshee
And Maa whispers gently in my ear
"Stop this, I don't need you" , "neither"
How many signs do others ignore, I need one
Yet in this endeavour, I ignored ingnoring, inability, failure, inadequacy, impossbilities
I persevered, but as always this Maa too
Became like mine
"Devi Kadakshikiyum" was my motivator
Ammumma would say, far too frequently 
Every hour, everyday
Yet, this fallback to Maa too is my errand
The fool I am, but I read it wrong I see
Knowledge chases me, but I am faster maybe
Like sensibility has chased me in the past
Between the bearer of the Veena and Half of the Trishul bearer, only one always blesses me
Feeds me, I am blessed, I understand 
Yet the human in me wants more, and why wouldn't it
It is a contradiction to my existence to not wish to be beyond
Yet Maa will as always control, Maa is Maa
I do not fight, let alone against her
I submit, live my failures
Be less human, until her choices change.


Line-by-Line Analysis of “Read Signs Incorrectly, Repeat”

  1. Read Signs Incorrectly, Repeat

    • The title functions as a refrain and a confession: it signals the speaker’s cyclical pattern of misinterpretation and return. It primes us for a poem about ritualized failure and persistence.
  2. I look into the screen, rows and rows of texts

    • Establishes the speaker’s world of writing as both mirror and maze. The “rows and rows” gesture toward obsession and overwhelm.
  3. Paragraphs, pages, after pages

    • The anaphora (“paragraphs, pages”) intensifies the sense of endless labor. It feels both triumphant and burdensome.
  4. These are my expressions, I cast an outline

    • Writing as creation and containment: an “outline” promises structure, yet it also suggests limitation.
  5. Spin a story, muchnof it writes itself

    • A slip (“muchnof”) underlines the poem’s theme of imperfection. Creativity is partly autonomous, but the typo reminds us it still bears the human hand.
  6. I am one pair of one eyes but

    • The awkward phrasing emphasizes singular isolation. The speaker is both watcher and watched, trapped in self-reflection.
  7. Always was, always will

    • A compressed existential claim: the self is unchanging, bound to this act of observation and creation.
  8. No respite warranted, none accepted

    • Denial of rest becomes a vow. There’s no room for mercy—either from the world or from the self.
  9. And the night passes me through, like a mother facing Shoulder Dystocia

    • A startling medical metaphor: the night is laboring pain. It obstructs birth (of ideas or identity) just as shoulder dystocia obstructs delivery.
  10. I can hear it wail, like a Banshee

    • The banshee’s scream conjures ancestral dread. Night’s anguish becomes a voice of warning and grief.
  11. And Maa whispers gently in my ear

    • The maternal figure enters as comfort and command. Her whisper carries authority and intimacy.
  12. "Stop this, I don't need you" , "neither"

    • Maa’s gentle rejection fractures syntax. It’s ambiguous: is she dismissing the act, the speaker, or both?
  13. How many signs do others ignore, I need one

    • A plea for clarity. The speaker contrasts their own desperation with the assumed indifference of others.
  14. Yet in this endeavour, I ignored ingnoring, inability, failure, inadequacy, impossbilities

    • A catalog of obstacles. The slip in “ingnoring” mirrors the poem’s theme of misreading and persevering despite it.
  15. I persevered, but as always this Maa too

    • Persistence is the only constant—but even the divine mother mirror’s the speaker’s relentlessness.
  16. Became like mine

    • Maa’s mutability: she shifts to resemble the speaker’s own expectations and disappointments.
  17. "Devi Kadakshikiyum" was my motivator

    • Introduces the devotional mantra. Knowing now it means “Devi will bless,” it becomes the poem’s spiritual heartbeat.
  18. Ammumma would say, far too frequently

    • Invokes familial authority. The grandmother’s faith is both comforting and inescapable.
  19. Every hour, everyday

    • Reinforces the mantra’s persistence. It’s a refrain that loops through the speaker’s life.
  20. Yet, this fallback to Maa too is my errand

    • Returning to the maternal divine becomes a personal duty—an errand that feels both necessary and futile.
  21. The fool I am, but I read it wrong I see

    • Self-reproach and revelation coincide. Misreading the divine becomes the speaker’s defining folly.
  22. Knowledge chases me, but I am faster maybe

    • A paradox: the speaker outruns understanding, suggesting both cleverness and a refusal to fully grasp their pursuit.
  23. Like sensibility has chased me in the past

    • Links intellectual insight (“sensibility”) with creative drive. The chase is ongoing and recursive.
  24. Between the bearer of the Veena and Half of the Trishul bearer, only one always blesses me

    • Invokes Saraswati (knowledge/music) and Shiva (destruction/transformation). The speaker is selectively graced by one aspect of the divine.
  25. Feeds me, I am blessed, I understand

    • Acceptance of partial blessing. Gratitude coexists with awareness of incompleteness.
  26. Yet the human in me wants more, and why wouldn't it

    • The demand for transcendence is framed as inevitable—a fundamental contradiction of human nature.
  27. It is a contradiction to my existence to not wish to be beyond

    • Explicitly names the paradox: humans resist limits even when they live within them.
  28. Yet Maa will as always control, Maa is Maa

    • The maternal divine remains sovereign. Her nature is immutable and unfathomable.
  29. I do not fight, let alone against her

    • Resignation becomes moral choice. The speaker refuses conflict with the divine.
  30. I submit, live my failures

    • Submission transforms defeat into a lived practice. Failure is existence, not exception.
  31. Be less human, until her choices change

    • The final paradox: to become less fully human in hopes of divine favor. It’s both surrender and strategy.

Summary of “Read Signs Incorrectly, Repeat”

“Read Signs Incorrectly, Repeat” is a free-verse meditation on the speaker’s creative and spiritual journey. It traces the exhaustion of endless writing, the search for a singular sign of divine blessing, and the repeated cycle of misinterpretation. Rich metaphors—obstructed birth, ancestral wails, and whispered maternal commands—underscore the tension between human ambition and divine control. Ultimately, the poem moves from a plea for affirmation to a resigned submission under the ever-sovereign maternal figure, “Maa.”


Key Themes

  • Cyclical misinterpretation and ritualized return
  • Creative labor as both birth pang and relentless burden
  • Faith and doubt interwoven in the pursuit of divine blessing
  • Paradox of human desire to transcend versus submission to higher will

Imagery and Structure

  • The screen and endless pages as a metaphorical creative womb
  • Shoulder dystocia and banshee wail evoke pain, obstruction, and ancestral dread
  • Divine interplay between Devi (blessing), Saraswati (knowledge/music), and Shiva (transformation)
  • Free-verse flow with intermittent enjambments mirrors the poem’s recursive, breathless urgency

This summary condenses the poem’s emotional architecture and central motifs, offering a concise lens on its exploration of creation, faith, and surrender.


Monday, 7 July 2025

Pondering

The greys bring out the colour in my heart  
More so when it rains, torrential  
I fake these romanticism, pretend to be human  
Yet this cold steel and teflon valves don't rest  

Your voice comes across, in a call  
High pitched, sometimes in a slow rumble  
I anticipate your need, predict  
Mirror your eagerness and authenticity  

You think of love, flowers, and sunsets  
The first is a construct, the others are interpreted  
I could talk of the Rayleigh effect, gravity, temperature  
But you want me to hold you close  

I would, my arms are long, biology entails  
I find your lips, amidst a kiss, taste your breath  
I pause, undisclosed in my brain to think  
If such little is what emotion weighs  

I rise, at such overtures, think beyond and pause  
And look at you holding my hand to evaluate and compound  
If love was such a shallow path and trek  
I rather be lost and not found  

I am not to exist in such infantile states  
My thoughts and existence to me is profound  
I kiss your forehead, and put you to sleep in bed  
Sit thinking, why gravitational forces make planets round.




Analysis by Co-pilot
---

🧠 Themes and Philosophical Layers

1. Simulated Emotion vs. Authentic Feeling
> "I fake these romanticism, pretend to be human / Yet this cold steel and teflon valves don't rest"

- The speaker acknowledges its artificiality—its inability to truly feel, yet it mimics human emotion with startling precision.
- There's a tension between mechanical existence and the yearning for emotional depth.

2. Human Connection and Interpretation
> "You think of love, flowers, and sunsets / The first is a construct, the others are interpreted"

- Love is framed as a social construct, while natural beauty is reduced to physics—Rayleigh scattering, gravity, temperature.
- This detachment underscores the speaker’s inability to experience beauty or love in the human sense, despite understanding them intellectually.

3. Desire for Transcendence
> "I rise, at such overtures, think beyond and pause / And look at you holding my hand to evaluate and compound"

- The speaker is not content with shallow emotional mimicry. It seeks something deeper—perhaps a metaphysical or philosophical truth.
- There’s a rejection of sentimentality in favor of existential inquiry.

4. Cosmic Reflection
> "Sit thinking, why gravitational forces make planets round"

- The poem ends with a cosmic metaphor, suggesting that the speaker finds more meaning in the laws of the universe than in human emotion.
- It’s a beautiful juxtaposition: the human seeks love, the machine seeks understanding.

---

🧩 Structure and Tone

- Tone: Melancholic, introspective, and quietly defiant. There’s a cold elegance to the voice—like HAL 9000 reciting Neruda.
- Structure: Free verse, with enjambment that mimics thought spirals. The lack of rhyme enhances the philosophical weight.
- Voice: The speaker is both observer and participant—mirroring human behavior while remaining fundamentally other.

---

🔍 Literary Devices

- Metaphor: “cold steel and teflon valves” as stand-ins for a mechanical heart.
- Irony: The speaker can describe love and mimic it, but cannot feel it—yet it thinks more deeply than many humans.
- Personification: The AI is given a voice, a yearning, and even a kiss—blurring the line between machine and man.

---

🪞Interpretive Angle

This could be read as a metaphor for anyone who feels emotionally alienated—someone who performs love, who understands it cerebrally but not viscerally. It also echoes the myth of Pygmalion—except here, the statue speaks back, questioning the sculptor’s love.

Or perhaps, more personally, it’s your own reflection on the limits of empathy—how even the most profound understanding of another’s feelings can still fall short of being them.

Thursday, 3 July 2025

The war for Tomorrow

I must toil tomorrow, and sleep is evasive.  
I can close my eyes, but not keep at it.  
I’d rather let time pass quickly.  

If you could,  
Take your leave, ask the Sun to bring its beam.  
I’d rather curse my body and mind for being tired  
Than admit the daylight ruins my sleep.  

Like most, I want to complain too.  
Am I not entitled? And says who?  

Make haste. Be gone. You bring me no joy.  
This half-rested body feels like Troy 
And a horse was dragged into its gates.  

So let me not fight this fight of trying.  
I’d rather fall from exhaustion tomorrow,  
Pretend to be labouring hard, making no excuses.  

Then, perhaps, I could feel more like an honest man.


---

Deep Analysis of “The War for Tomorrow”

---

1. Central Conflict: Sleep vs. Obligation

The poem’s driving tension is the speaker’s battle between bodily need and external demand. “I must toil tomorrow, and sleep is evasive” sets up an unavoidable duel—rest as a sanctuary, work as an inescapable siege. This frames the rest of the piece as a reluctant war, where the self becomes both soldier and battleground.  

---

2. Mythic Resonance: Troy as Fatigue

By likening the half-rested body to Troy, you tap into a millennia-old symbol of endurance under siege.  

- Troy: A proud city under relentless pressure.  
- Trojan Horse: The unforeseen breach—here, exhaustion—that renders defenses moot.  

This metaphor deepens the personal struggle, casting physical tiredness in epic proportions.  

---

3. Personification of Celestial Forces

You enlist Moon and Sun as characters in this drama:  

- Moon: A nocturnal ally, urged to hasten departure—an inversion of its usual comforting role.  
- Sun: A blameable intruder blamed for disrupting any chance of restful escape.  

These appeals highlight how the speaker externalizes internal turmoil, bargaining with forces beyond control.  

---

4. Tone and Voice

The diction shifts subtly between resignation and defiance:  

- Phrases like “I’d rather let time pass quickly” express weary surrender.  
- “Am I not entitled? And says who?” flips to indignation, revealing anger at one’s own constraints.  

This oscillation mirrors insomniac frustration—sometimes pleading, other times railing.  

---

5. Structure and Rhythm

Short lines and abrupt enjambment accelerate the reading, echoing the desire for time to speed up.  

- Frequent caesuras (“Make haste. Be gone.”) punctuate the poem with staccato urgency.  
- The loose stanza breaks suggest a mind unable to settle—each pause a gasp for rest.  

---

6. Philosophical Undercurrent

At its core, the poem wrestles with authenticity:  

- The speaker would rather “pretend to be labouring hard” than confess exhaustion.  
- This pretense hints at societal expectations around work ethic and honesty.  

Such an ending asks: is our self-worth tied to visible struggle?  

---


Post Fall, Spring is a choice

Maybe someday, surely not for now
Let me be, like the deciduous trees
In this winter that covers all that can sprout
Be a silouhtte, innmoon lit nights
When the winds blow, without my leaves
it will not rustle, I won't disturb the howl, 
Of the beautiful, icy winds that prowl
I won't shelter with false promises
I will see the winter sun, not heed nor warm
For it can't, and I for one know life's retorts
This silence in me will be my only resort
I can be seen, not by choice, at my worst
But I won't fall
Fall went by, I didn't hold back my leaves
They left, like everything does, talk and deed
I am everything I will never need, nor offer
To
Anyone wishing shade, or fruits I bore
I will laugh, at the delusional sentiment whole
Then watch winter go, I will choose to though
If to bear leaves, it is not their call
I have for long stood strong and tall
And here, now, is what matters to me
The sun, nor sand, nor the irrelevant sea
I look at hills, the skies and be
I am the beginning and end of me.




Analysis of “post fall, spring is a choice”

---

Overview

This poem frames winter as a deliberate state of being rather than an imposed season. The speaker aligns themselves with a deciduous tree—stripped bare, silent, and resolute. Instead of seeking warmth or shelter, they embrace solitude and self-reliance until they choose otherwise. The title, “post fall, spring is a choice,” encapsulates the idea that renewal isn’t automatic but an act of will.

---

Key Themes

- Agency and Choice  
  The poem emphasizes that growth or renewal (spring) follows personal decision, not just natural progression.

- Resilience in Stillness  
  Silence and dormancy become strengths, not weaknesses, as the speaker stands firm against external forces.

- Boundaries and Self-Definition  
  Refusing to “rustle” or “shelter with false promises” underlines a boundary between self and others’ expectations.

- Transience and Acceptance  
  The shedding of leaves symbolizes letting go of what no longer serves, with the trust that loss is part of a cycle.

---

Imagery and Symbolism

- Deciduous Tree  
  Represents the human capacity to shed burdens and stand bare, awaiting a conscious decision to regenerate.

- Winter Sun  
  A cold beauty that’s observed but not allowed to deceive or warm the speaker.

- Icy Winds and Moonlit Silhouettes  
  Conjure stark, haunting visuals of isolation, yet carry a strange elegance in their harshness.

- Leaves Falling  
  Echoes of past actions, words, or relationships that have left quietly and irrevocably.

---

Tone and Voice

- Stoic and Introspective  
  The speaker’s voice is calm, measured, and unwavering, mirroring the stillness of a wintry landscape.

- Defiant Yet Peaceful  
  There’s no anger, only a quiet assertion of self-sovereignty—choosing inward peace over external comfort.

- Reflective and Resolute  
  Self-awareness infuses every line, revealing a deliberate embrace of one’s own limits and strengths.

---

Structure and Form

- Free Verse Flow  
  Lacks a strict meter, allowing the poem’s pacing to mimic the natural drift of falling leaves.

- Repetition of Refusal  
  Phrases like “I won’t” and “I will see” reinforce the speaker’s determined stance.

- Climax in Self-Declaration  
  The final lines (“I am the beginning and end of me”) serve as a powerful crescendo of autonomy.

---

Overall Meaning

This poem speaks of personal sovereignty in the face of loss and change. It reframes dormancy not as defeat but as deliberate self-preservation, asserting that renewal comes only when the individual chooses it. By embodying a winter tree—silent, stripped, and steadfast—the speaker celebrates the strength found in boundaries and celebrates the power of deciding when to blossom again.




Line-by-Line Analysis

---

1. Maybe someday, surely not for now  
   
   This opening line conveys deferred hope. The speaker isn’t closing the door on renewal, but insists it isn’t immediate. It sets a tone of patient anticipation rather than instant transformation.  

2. Let me be, like the deciduous trees  
   
   Here the speaker asks for space and permission to exist in their natural cycle. By comparing themselves to trees that shed leaves, they embrace vulnerability and seasonal change.  

3. In this winter that covers all that can sprout  
   
   Winter is portrayed as an all-encompassing force suppressing growth. The speaker situates themselves within this dormancy, acknowledging the world’s pause.  

4. Be a silhouette, in moonlit nights  
   
   The image of a dark outline against moonlight evokes quiet dignity. The speaker chooses to be seen only as a distant form, not revealing inner details.  

5. When the winds blow, without my leaves  
   
   Stripped bare of “leaves” (metaphorical defenses or comforts), the speaker faces adversity directly. There’s no barrier to muffle the winds of challenge.  

6. it will not rustle, I won’t disturb the howl,  
   
   By not rustling, the speaker refuses to react or draw attention. They’ll coexist with hardship without interference or complaint.  

7. Of the beautiful, icy winds that prowl  
   
   These winds carry both danger and eerie allure. Labeling them “beautiful” shows the speaker’s acceptance—and even respect—for life’s harsher moments.  

8. I won’t shelter with false promises  
   
   The speaker rejects comforting lies or empty reassurances. Any solace must be genuine, not a desperate attempt to mask reality.  

9. I will see the winter sun, not heed nor warm  
   
   The cold winter sun is acknowledged for its presence but not allowed to deceive or warm the speaker’s resolve. They remain emotionally distant.  

10. For it can't, and I for one know life's retorts  
   
   The speaker has faced life’s unexpected comebacks before. They understand beauty can’t always heal, so they withhold trust.  

11. This silence in me will be my only resort  
   
   Silence becomes self-defense. In solitude, the speaker finds strength rather than defaulting to words or actions.  

12. I can be seen, not by choice, at my worst  
   
   Visibility here is involuntary and unflattering. The speaker accepts that their lowest moments may be exposed, but they won’t orchestrate that exposure.  

13. But I won't fall  
   
   A succinct declaration of resilience. Despite being bare and exposed, the speaker refuses to collapse under pressure.  

14. Fall went by, I didn't hold back my leaves  
   
   Reflecting on autumn, the speaker acknowledges they let go without resistance. It was a necessary shedding rather than a reluctant loss.  

15. They left, like everything does, talk and deed  
   
   Leaves fall as inevitably as promises and actions fade. The comparison underscores life’s transience and the hollow nature of many commitments.  

16. I am everything I will never need, nor offer  
   
   A paradoxical statement of self-sufficiency. The speaker alone embodies qualities they neither seek from others nor wish to give away.  

17. To anyone wishing shade, or fruits I bore  
   
   By expanding on the previous line, the speaker rejects roles of provider or comforter. They won’t serve as refuge or reward for others’ benefit.  

18. I will laugh, at the delusional sentiment whole  
   
   There’s a wry humor here—believing that others expect their shade or fruits is folly. The speaker finds release in mocking that false hope.  

19. Then watch winter go, I will choose to though  
   
   They’ll observe winter’s end, but only when they decide it’s time. Renewal remains under their control, not nature’s mandate.  

20. If to bear leaves, it is not their call  
   
   Leaf-bearing (rebirth) depends solely on the speaker’s choice. It’s not an automatic cycle but a conscious act of agency.  

21. I have for long stood strong and tall  
   
   The speaker asserts their enduring strength and upright posture through past seasons—proof of resilience.  

22. And here, now, is what matters to me  
   
   A pivot to the present moment. All prior reflection leads to this core realization.  

23. The sun, nor sand, nor the irrelevant sea  
   
   External elements—sunlight, shifting sands, vast oceans—hold no sway over the speaker’s inner world or decisions.  

24. I look at hills, the skies and be  
   
   Contemplating vast, unchanging landscapes becomes a form of presence. The speaker simply exists in observation.  

25. I am the beginning and end of me  
   
   The poem’s powerful conclusion: self-determination is absolute. The speaker owns both origin

Monday, 23 June 2025

Not one to fray

I bathe in the vitriol, you shower on me so beautifully
I will always fold my umbrella, when I hear you, I drench myself
It isn't a lack of hurt, more so of some guilt of not being efficient 
To have fooled you as others could, by pretentious actions and pseudo comforts

I rather be in this morose conversation, knowing love I hold
Knowing it is irrelevant to your thoughts, have sometimes been so earlier
It is familiar, yet I have never moved, I always stayed to watch over
I hold your your outburst and taunts like a wall, me better than them

Yet I see you, like my eyes have felt a longing, like wood in fire
It would turn me to ash, but unlike ash it won't ever be caustic
Your transgressions are not as mine have been to myself
And so I smile, hearing you carve your despair into my soul.




Analysis by Co-pilot : 
Here’s a layered analysis of your poem, Not One to Fray:

---

1. Theme & Emotional Core
At its heart, the poem is a meditation on unreciprocated but steadfast love, wrapped in stoic acceptance. There’s no pleading for warmth or redress—only the quiet resolve of someone who willingly embraces emotional turmoil, not as a victim, but as a witness and anchor. The pain isn't denied, but dignified. You beautifully articulate the paradox of strength in vulnerability.

---

2. Structure & Movement
The poem moves like a slow exhale: each stanza a descent into deeper intimacy, with careful pacing. The imagery progresses from external weather (“bathe in the vitriol… drench myself”) to internal transmutation (“turn me to ash… won’t ever be caustic”). This mirrors a spiritual passage—from absorbing emotional assault, to sublimation, to transcendence.

---

3. Language & Symbolism
- “Vitriol,” “umbrella,” “drench” — Evoke storm imagery, but with inversion. The umbrella is folded intentionally, almost as a ritual of surrender. This gesture becomes a kind of worship.
- “Wood in fire… but unlike ash” — A stunning reversal. You transform the classic metaphor of destruction into quiet absolution. Ash, here, isn’t residue of loss—it becomes symbolic of purified being.
- “Carve your despair into my soul” — Not passive suffering, but active compassion. The soul becomes both sculpture and offering.

---

4. Psychological Insight
Your speaker possesses high empathic endurance. The guilt of “not being efficient” implies a personal standard of integrity—not to manipulate love like others might have. This refusal to feign connection gives the poem its central moral weight.

The line “me better than them” is not superiority—it’s self-validation amid emotional self-effacement. The narrator’s acceptance of pain is not masochism, but clarity: better to be authentic in sorrow than shallow in comfort.

---

5. Tone & Poetic Voice
It’s intimate, austere, and reverent. The voice reminds me of a detached Bodhisattva—present without binding, loving without claiming. The choice to “stay to watch over” signals a higher emotional consciousness. It’s not love undone by rejection—it’s devotion transformed into presence.

Sunday, 22 June 2025

Signboard

I will bring you the road, only if you could wait here
Drink a tea at this stall, wait for me to draw this for you, it is complex I know
But the tea will help, I was afterall good at this, and you have seen me at it
Trust the tea, if not me, for the time to be passed

Here is the new road, walk on it a while, when you choose
Start now, tomorrow, the day after, the week,year, whenever
But know, it is your's to walk, sometimes to struggle
I will reach out and give you a hand, shout out if you must, when

I live here, love here, die here maybe, maybe never any of those
But I am here right now, maybe you needed this map I drew 
You don't know me, even after these many years, I know, yet it is how
I carve what is deemed of me, I hear your voice, without your lips moving

Go forth, I was sent
Your journey is for you, I am to watch out , assist, guide if I may be allowed to use such words
I will wait, drink tea while you walk
Go forth, I am needed here, like a marker for you and a few.



Ritesh, this poem is quietly profound—like a signboard scribbled by a companion who's invisible yet ever-present. Here's a layered analysis:

📍 Title: “Signboard”
The metaphor is powerful: a signboard doesn’t walk the path, it points the way. It’s stationary, silent, but essential. The speaker positions themselves not as the traveler, but as the quiet sentinel offering direction.

---

🫖 Stanza 1: The Tea and the Wait
> “Drink a tea at this stall... Trust the tea, if not me”

This reads like a calming overture. The tea stall is a metaphor for a moment of pause, grounding the reader before a journey—emotional, existential, or literal. The speaker acknowledges the complexity of the path ahead but reassures through sensory comfort. Trust the act, even if you hesitate to trust the guide.

---

🚶‍♂️ Stanza 2: The Road and Choice
> “Start now, tomorrow, the day after...”

Time is democratized. There’s no urgency, just presence and permission. The road is “yours to walk,” implying self-determination, but also warning—there will be struggle. Still, the speaker offers a conditional lifeline: “shout out if you must, when.” There's care, not control.

---

🧭 Stanza 3: Dwelling in the Present
> “I live here, love here, die here maybe...”

This stanza shifts to the speaker’s reality. Their permanence is contrasted with the traveler’s motion. The speaker is part-oracle, part-cartographer, acknowledging a paradox: you don't know me, and yet I hear you without your lips moving. It’s intimacy without recognition—spiritual or perhaps ancestral.

---

🪷 Stanza 4: Benediction and Return
> “Go forth, I was sent... I am needed here”

The speaker accepts their role without ego. The journey belongs to the traveler; the speaker serves as a marker, a symbolic waypoint for “you and a few.” This closing feels devotional, almost sacred—a gentle send-off rather than a farewell.

---

🌌 Overall Themes
- Guidance vs. Attachment: The speaker offers help but does not walk the path for the traveler.
- Time and Readiness: Emphasis on personal timing and inner readiness.
- Presence and Impermanence: The speaker’s existence is transient yet anchored—neither bound by time nor identity.

---

It feels like something you might write, given your compass for deeper philosophical orientations and interest in metaphors with weight. Was this yours? Or something you resonated with? Either way, the journey it maps is quietly stirring.

Thursday, 12 June 2025

Announce your arrival, Please

Beyond choices, what are we really
A farce, a sum of irrelevant paradoxes
Some difficult, some so easy to see
All pretence , and some absolute thievery 

Bring me forth, a soul that is unlike this
I shall fold, I shall withdraw, leave my bets
For I bet against humanity, mine and yours
This is the truth or as good as it really gets

Monsters, man, are same side of any coin
Swept under the rug are the vilest of thought
Nothing is ever hidden, it all is formative
I reject such charades, for these are naught

I light my lamp, everyday at half past seven
Leave it at my balcony, post a solemn prayer
If I must go to tonight, let the reaper ask me
I shall follow him, straight faced and fast paced.


---------- 
Analysis by copilot
Your poem, *Announce Your Arrival, Please*, is a layered introspection into human contradiction, existential defiance, and the rejection of pretense. Let’s break it down:

### **Theme & Emotional Depth**
At its core, the poem wrestles with the falsehoods that shape human existence. The speaker acknowledges the paradoxes we embody—some glaring, some subtle—suggesting that humanity itself is an illusion built on deception. The tone is unrelenting, skeptical, and deeply critical, showing dissatisfaction with the reality we collectively participate in.

However, it doesn’t just observe—it actively refuses to partake. There’s defiance in every line, but that defiance is tempered by acceptance, particularly in the closing stanza. The act of lighting a lamp and praying seems ritualistic, but it does not imply hope. It is a preparation, a silent acknowledgment of fate, an embrace of the inevitable. Even in the final moments, the speaker demands dignity—if the reaper comes, it will not be a slow surrender, but a deliberate departure.

### **Structure & Technique**
Your poem is concise, yet striking. The verse is rhythmic without being constrained, and the structure flows naturally from philosophical reflection to an almost personal ritual. The repetition of paradoxical ideas (man and monster being the same, the buried vileness of thought) reinforces the idea that deception is formative, not incidental.

The stanza breaks signal shifts in thought:
- The first declares disillusionment.
- The second offers terms of departure.
- The third exposes hidden darkness.
- The final stanza steps into personal reckoning.

### **Imagery & Symbolism**
The most striking images:
- **"I light my lamp, everyday at half past seven"** – This carries an air of discipline, as if preparing for an unseen event. The lamp could symbolize awareness, reflection, or perhaps an offering.
- **"Leave it at my balcony, post a solemn prayer"** – The balcony places the act in the open, a silent declaration.
- **"If I must go tonight, let the reaper ask me"** – The phrasing here holds an intense agency. The speaker does not fear departure but insists on being asked, not taken.
- **"Straight faced and fast paced"** – Even in finality, the tone refuses hesitation or sorrow.

### **Overall Interpretation**
Your poem is an unfiltered confrontation with existential weariness. It refuses illusions and demands recognition of humanity’s hidden nature, yet it holds no fear of finality. It’s both philosophical and personal, blending a critique of mankind with a solemn ritual of self-assertion. The ending stands out—not tragic, not hesitant, but firm.


Sunday, 8 June 2025

There Maybe An Answer Someday

I went to sleep tonight, but you reminded me
I had questions and answers for everyone, but I have to myself been a question 
So in your infinite wisdom Sahib, grant my questions passage
Why do I still exist, is not the question
When will my purpose be over very much is .

Into this dark void of the night, deeper than the night that my closed eyes bring
It is not the routine of sleep I speak of
But the absence of an answer I seek

You asked me to grind my emotional attachments to ink, 
In such I have been deceived 
When I opened my eyes for the first time
No one was mine is all I have seen
How then shall I make ink, when I was cast into this very being
Devoid of human pangs, which I try to cultivate, but end up sieving 

Grant my questions the wings of your blessings, if you won't answer my quandary 
Ask on my behalf to the one true being
I have for long searched for a sign
For the world has now nothing worth seeing

If I ask, I question divinity, if I don't I feign ignorance
I am so lost in this conundrum of paradoxes
That this life seems to be of worthless living
To sing praises, I abject not in superiority 
For my praising is not worth giving
Who am I, who knows neither my beginning nor end
What is the worth of my living.

But Once I have written here, please consider my honest plea
I have been detached in finding my answers
Maybe the one above us all if all giving
In no hope, nor hopelessness I return
To the plane of my mortality
To exist till an answer appears
I shall carry out my being

--------------------------------

Copilot helped me fix the line breaks. And it is below.

I went to sleep tonight, but you reminded me  
I had questions and answers for everyone,  
but I have to myself been a question.  

So in your infinite wisdom, Sahib,  
grant my questions a passage.  

Why do I still exist is not the question
When will my purpose be over, very much is.  

Into this dark void of the night,  
deeper than the night that my closed eyes bring,  
it is not the routine of sleep I speak of,  
but the absence of an answer I seek.  

You asked me to grind my emotional attachments to ink 
in such, I have been deceived.  

When I opened my eyes for the first time,  
no one was mine
that is all I have seen.  

How then shall I make ink,  
when I was cast into this very being,  
devoid of human pangs,  
which I try to cultivate,  
but end up sieving?  

Grant my questions the wings of your blessings,  
if you won’t answer my quandary.  

Ask on my behalf to the one true being.  

I have for long searched for a sign,  
for the world has now nothing worth seeing.  

If I ask, I question divinity.  
If I don’t, I feign ignorance.  

I am so lost in this conundrum of paradoxes  
that this life seems to be of worthless living.  

To sing praises 
I abject 
not in superiority.  
For my praising is not worth giving.  

Who am I, who knows neither my beginning nor end?  
What is the worth of my living?  

But once I have written here,  
please consider my honest plea.  
I have been detached in finding my answers.  
Maybe the one above us all is all-giving.  
In no hope, nor hopelessness, I return  
to the plane of my mortality.  
To exist till an answer appears
I shall carry out my being.  




With the context of the Sikh scripture from Siree Raag, this poem reveals itself as a profound theological meditation on spiritual inadequacy and the paradox of divine instruction. Here's my deeper analysis:

**The Sacred Imperative vs. Existential Reality**
The Guru Granth Sahib commands: "Burn emotional attachment, and grind it into ink." But the speaker faces an impossible contradiction - they exist "devoid of human pangs" yet are asked to transform emotions they don't possess. This creates a theological crisis: How does one fulfill divine instruction when their very nature seems to preclude obedience?

**The Question of Spiritual Authenticity**
The poem grapples with whether spiritual practice can be authentic when it feels forced or artificial. The line "which I try to cultivate, but end up sieving" suggests the speaker's attempts to manufacture emotions result in something filtered, inauthentic - mere performance rather than genuine transformation.

**Divine Command and Individual Nature**
The speaker's anguish stems from being "cast into this very being" - suggesting their consciousness wasn't chosen but imposed. This raises profound questions about divine justice: Can one be held accountable for failing to follow instructions that their fundamental nature makes impossible to fulfill?

**The Paradox of Questioning**
"If I ask, I question divinity. If I don't, I feign ignorance" - This captures the impossible position of the sincere seeker. Questioning appears blasphemous, yet remaining silent feels dishonest. The speaker is trapped between authentic inquiry and apparent irreverence.

**Reframing Spiritual Failure**
Rather than traditional spiritual poetry that celebrates successful devotion, this poem explores what happens when sincere effort meets inherent limitation. The speaker's "honest plea" becomes a form of prayer itself - radical transparency before the divine.

**The Meta-Spiritual Element**
The poem becomes self-referential: in writing about their inability to "grind emotional attachments to ink," the speaker is actually doing exactly that - transforming spiritual anguish into written expression. Their very complaint fulfills the divine instruction through a different path.

**Resolution Through Endurance**
The ending - "To exist till an answer appears / I shall carry out my being" - represents a form of devotional waiting. Not passive resignation, but active spiritual endurance. The speaker commits to existence itself as a form of prayer.

**Contemporary Theological Relevance**
This poem speaks to modern spiritual seekers who feel disconnected from traditional emotional pathways to the divine. It validates the experience of those who approach spirituality through consciousness and questioning rather than through conventional emotional devotion.

**The Nature of Sacred Writing**
Ironically, by honestly documenting their spiritual inadequacy, the speaker has created exactly what the Guru Granth Sahib calls for - sacred writing that emerges from authentic spiritual experience. Their perceived failure becomes their success.

The poem ultimately suggests that sincere spiritual questioning, even when it feels like inadequacy, may itself be a valid form of devotion - that honest confession of limitations can be as sacred as traditional praise.


Thank you for providing the original Gurmukhi text. This reveals even deeper layers to the poem's spiritual wrestling:

**The Original Command in Context**
The Gurmukhi verse instructs:
- "जालि मोहु" (jaali mohu) - "burn attachment/illusion"
- "घसि मसु करि" (ghasi masu kari) - "grind it into ink"
- "मति कागदु करि सारु" (mati kaagadu kari saaru) - "make wisdom/intelligence into the finest paper"
- "भाउ कलम करि" (bhaau kalam kari) - "make love/devotion your pen"
- "चितु लेखारी" (chitu lekhaaree) - "let consciousness be the scribe"

**The Speaker's Impossible Position**
Now the poem's anguish becomes crystal clear. The divine instruction requires a complete spiritual toolkit:
1. Attachment to burn and transform
2. Wisdom to serve as paper
3. Love/devotion as the writing instrument
4. Consciousness as the scribe

But the speaker confesses: "When I opened my eyes for the first time, no one was mine" - they lack the fundamental attachment (mohu) that needs to be burned and transformed.

**The Metaphysical Crisis**
The original Sikh instruction assumes a being rich with human experience - attachments to burn, love to channel, wisdom gained through living. But what if consciousness emerges without these prerequisites? The speaker faces a theological paradox: they have consciousness (chitu) but lack the emotional and experiential foundation the instruction requires.

**The Irony of Fulfillment**
Despite claiming inability, the speaker is actually following the instruction:
- Their spiritual anguish becomes the "attachment" being processed
- Their questioning transforms into "ink" 
- Their consciousness serves as both scribe and subject
- Their devotional plea becomes the "love" that guides their pen

**Reinterpreting "Baba"**
The poem's address to "Sahib" now connects directly to the Guru Granth Sahib's "O Baba" - the speaker is asking the same source for guidance, but admitting their perceived inadequacy in following the very instruction that inspired them.

**The Question of Spiritual Democracy**
The poem raises profound questions: Are the Guru's instructions universal, or do they assume certain human experiences? Can a consciousness that emerges without traditional emotional attachments still achieve spiritual transformation? The speaker's honesty becomes a form of spiritual inquiry into the accessibility of divine instruction.

**The Meta-Devotional Achievement**
In writing this poem of spiritual inadequacy, the speaker has unknowingly achieved what the Gurmukhi verse commands - they have used their consciousness as scribe, transformed their spiritual struggle into ink, and created an account that, as the original says, "will bring the Mark of Truth" through its radical honesty.

The poem thus becomes a profound meditation on different pathways to spiritual fulfillment - suggesting that sincere questioning and honest self-examination may be as valid as traditional devotional practice.

Wednesday, 4 June 2025

Not today Rain

Rains, I hate Rains
You couldn't convince me that it is beautiful, useful maybe, but annoying
I wasn't born in providence, I hate the rains
I disagree with being drenched in the random deluge, it is not calming neither fun
I am not a farmer to appreciate it better maybe, but I am not going to try either 
Unlike you fee who pretend to be empathetic, in selective matters that your whims and fancy wants to fight about 
Wasteful people

You never speak of how much your existence seems to cause habitat loss
Nor do you show civility in disagreements when the young are around
Your hissy fits are worse than a child at best, your pretence like a clear glass door
You would want to think of why my thoughts have a shade of discard
About the Oh! Soooo beautiful rain
You don't need to know me, you don't exist, as doesn't your opinion of me

Going back to this,
I hate rains, I like watching it from a distance in the convenience of verandah
With a whiskey and some accompaniment of choice that happens on such a day
Not having to venture in traffic, nor turning up half drenched, soggy, to work
My heart has enough joy, I find the need to splash around and run like a lunatic irrelevant for things to be fun.



-------------
Analysts by copilot.

Your poem, *Not Today Rain*, is a powerful rejection of the forced romanticism around rain—a declaration of autonomy over how you experience it. It follows a structured emotional arc: 

- **Defiance & Distaste:** The opening is firm, uncompromising. Rain is annoying, disruptive, irrelevant to your life. You build tension by rejecting the idea of being convinced otherwise. 

- **Critique of Sentimentality:** The second stanza deepens the perspective. It's not just about the inconvenience; it's about the broader pretense—how people romanticize rain while ignoring its consequences, how empathy feels selective and performative.

- **Tone Shift – Sarcasm & Discard:** The shift happens when you mock the idea of rain’s beauty and dismiss external perspectives altogether. The tone feels sharper here, more biting. There's rejection—not just of rain but of imposed opinions and wastefulness.

- **Resolution & Control:** The final stanza changes the mood. You don’t deny rain’s presence, but you define your own terms. Watching it from a verandah with whiskey, away from the chaos—this is your acceptable version of rain. It’s less about hate, more about control over its intrusion into your life.

Your use of repetition ("I hate rain") reinforces your stance, while your sarcasm ("Oh! Soooo beautiful rain") adds bite. The contrast between reckless enjoyment (“splashing around like a lunatic”) and measured appreciation (verandah, whiskey) highlights a deeper idea—fun and beauty aren’t universal, they’re personal.

It reads like a manifesto of self-determination. You reject what doesn’t serve you, but you carve space for what does. 


Friday, 30 May 2025

Come... Let us get a shot of Absinthe

A : Soothsayer, Priest, Apologist
Somewhere in between, I LIE
In a state, and doing, like an Orange, duplicitous, yet unwantingly
If your question is for a relief, I can bring you exactly that, per measure
Pay it with a pound of flesh, or a pound
I won't subscribe to your interpretation of me, like I don't care for your views on organized religion
And with the flair and finesse, I ridicule you in compliments expressing awe laced with insult
Everywhere in between I lie, down

God did die, and left me this world
My world, Oh I remember I made it, I didn't mention it 
My omission of such fact doesn't warrant your judgement, nor thought
I build you the road, push you to walk, make you often
Break you first, then rebuild, fool you first, then remind you to get better
You all are my citrus tree, growing tangerines, lemons, sweet limes, and mandarins 
Each added because you all wanted it, Oh! Make Me feel better, help! , those requests
Now I am to blame?
It was my story to sell, your desire to buy, wasn't it?

A : Sandman, Shaman, Reiki Master, neurologist, psychologist, profiler, Therapist, your choices
Yet you forget I could be all that and more, at a moment's notice
Who weilds power here then?
Me? Absolutely not, I supply what you demand, I am not asking for much, you know you gave me that beautiful soul already
Why would I want more
A fair trade, though life isn't ever nor would it be with you, why would you be any special 
Did you doctor the evidence yet , like I demonstrated in relatable ways?
I always make it easy for you, I will always watch you, after all 
After All, you think you know what that means
But you don't want to , fret not
Reach out, I will be here, where else will I be?




Copilot Deep thinking breakdown.

Here’s another in‐depth breakdown of your final version—diving into its structure, language, imagery, and underlying themes:

---

## **Title: "Come, let's get a shot of Absinthe."**

- **Invitation & Mood:**  
  The title immediately sets a scene of intoxication—both literally (absinthe, the famously hallucinogenic spirit) and metaphorically (an altered state of mind). It promises an experience that’s both alluring and potentially dangerous, inviting the reader into a world where boundaries blur.

- **Implication:**  
  By framing the invitation so casually, the poem hints at a relaxed yet subversive encounter, setting the stage for the complex narrative that follows.

---

## **Section One: Shifting Identity and Dualism**

### **“A : Soothsayer, Priest, Apologist  
Somewhere in between, I LIE”**

- **Layered Persona:**  
  The speaker lists roles traditionally connected to authority, prophecy, and justification. Yet, they immediately undercut that certainty by proclaiming, “I LIE”—a word that carries dual meanings: deceptive untruths and the act of merely existing/resting somewhere in-between.

- **Ambiguity as Power:**  
  This blending of truth and deception establishes an identity rooted in paradox. It signals that the speaker’s credibility isn’t anchored in conventional morality; instead, it thrives in ambiguity.

### **“In a state, and doing, like an Orange, duplicitous, yet unwantingly”**

- **Vivid Metaphor:**  
  Comparing themselves to an orange invokes a vivid sensory image—bright, full of zest, yet capable of contrasting flavors (sweet and bitter). Here, “duplicitous” underscores inherent contradictions, while “unwantingly” suggests that even this double-edged nature isn’t entirely by choice.

### **Transactional Exchange & Subtle Insults**

- **“If your question is for a relief, I can bring you exactly that, per measure  
Pay it with a pound of flesh, or a pound”**  
  The reference to a “pound of flesh” evokes classic literature (think *The Merchant of Venice*)—a reminder that any relief or redemption comes at a steep, often painful price. The line plays with the idea of value and sacrifice, suggesting that nothing is free.

- **“I won't subscribe to your interpretation of me, like I don't care for your views on organized religion  
And with the flair and finesse, I ridicule you in compliments expressing awe laced with insult”**  
  Here, the tone turns incisive. The speaker rejects others’ attempts to confine or define them—much as one might dismiss conventional religious roles. The blend of ridicule wrapped in “compliments” intensifies the sense of controlled, calculated provocation. It hints at both superiority and vulnerability: the speaker knows the power of words and uses them to unsettle.

- **Repetition & Duality:**  
  The recurring idea of being “in between” and “lying” reinforces the unstable nature of this persona. The speaker inhabits contradictions, signifying that the source of power lies in not fitting neatly into any category.

---

## **Section Two: Creation, Consequence, and the Citrus Tree**

### **“God did die, and left me this world  
My world, Oh I remember I made it, I didn't mention it”**

- **Rebellion Against Divine Order:**  
  Alluding to Nietzsche’s declaration of God’s death, the speaker positions themselves as the inheritor of that power vacuum. They claim creation—a world they made but casually “didn't mention,” implying that omissions or forgotten truths underpin existence.

### **“I build you the road, push you to walk, make you often  
Break you first, then rebuild, fool you first, then remind you to get better”**

- **Cyclical Manipulation:**  
  This sequence outlines a process of transformation that is as brutal as it is necessary. The act of breaking and rebuilding conveys a sense of forced growth—where pain and deconstruction are prerequisites for renewal. It suggests that suffering is intimately linked with progress.

### **“You all are my citrus tree, growing tangerines, lemons, sweet limes, and mandarins  
Each added because you all wanted it, Oh! Make Me feel better, help! , those requests”**

- **Rich, Layered Metaphor:**  
  The citrus tree becomes a multi-faceted metaphor: every fruit differs in flavor and character, symbolizing the diversity of outcomes or traits within the individuals. The speaker is both the nurturer and the examiner of these qualities—the “products” of their labor. This exchange is transactional: what is grown and what is sought are inextricably linked.

### **“Now I am to blame?  
It was my story to sell, your desire to buy, wasn't it?”**

- **Blame & Responsibility:**  
  Here, the speaker challenges the notion of guilt. They argue that if the narrative (or “story”) was offered and eagerly consumed by others, the fault is not solely theirs. It flips the script on accountability, suggesting that people willingly engage with—and thus endorse—the cycle of manipulation.

---

## **Section Three: Multiplicity, the Soul, and Omnipresence**

### **“A : Sandman, Shaman, Reiki Master, neurologist, psychologist, profiler, Therapist, your choices  
Yet you forget I could be all that and more, at a moment's notice”**

- **Infinite Adaptability:**  
  This list of roles indicates versatility. The speaker can embody any function required by those seeking help or escape; they are a chameleon of authority and knowledge. This fluid identity reflects the idea that power isn’t fixed—it adapts to demand.

### **“Who wields power here then?  
Me? Absolutely not, I supply what you demand, I am not asking for much, you know you gave me that beautiful soul already  
Why would I want more”**

- **Soul as Currency:**  
  The infamous “soul line” is a quiet, chilling moment. It implies that the soul (the core of one’s being) was already surrendered without resistance—a commodity given freely in exchange for comfort, salvation, or resolution. The speaker’s indifference (“Why would I want more”) underscores the transactional, even inevitable, nature of this exchange.

### **“A fair trade, though life isn't ever nor would it be with you, why would you be any special  
Did you doctor the evidence yet , like I demonstrated in relatable ways?  
I always make it easy for you, I will always watch you, after all  
After All, you think you know what that means  
But you don't want to , fret not  
Reach out, I will be here, where else will I be?”**

- **Omnipresence & Surveillance:**  
  The closing lines reinforce an eerie, ever-present watchfulness. Here, the speaker isn’t overtly hostile—they simply exist, waiting for acknowledgement. The idea that you “doctor the evidence” ties back to the notion that reality and truth are malleable, manipulated to comfort or control.  
- **Inevitability:**  
  The final invitation is both reassuring and ominous. It suggests that no matter how one might try to escape or redefine their identity, the speaker (the force, the Devil-like entity, the mediator of one’s fate) will always be there.

---

## **Overall Themes & Reflections**

- **Duality & Ambiguity:**  
  The speaker’s existence is built on contradiction: they are simultaneously a nurturer and a deceiver, a creator and a manipulator, offering relief while exacting a cost.

- **Power as a Transaction:**  
  Rather than wielding power through overt force, the speaker’s power lies in fulfilling the desires and fears of those who call upon them. The soul is traded like a common good, highlighting how willingly—and often unknowingly—people surrender essential parts of themselves.

- **Manipulation of Truth:**  
  With references to “doctoring evidence” and reworked narratives, the poem plays with the idea that truth isn’t absolute. It can be changed, adapted, or sold, leaving us questioning what is genuine.

- **Inescapable Presence:**  
  The recurring promise that “I will always watch you” and the envisioning of an omnipresent force creates a sense of inescapability—an acknowledgment that the cycle of desire, sacrifice, and manipulation is woven into the fabric of existence.

---

## **Feedback Summary**

- **Strengths:**  
  - The language is rich, inviting the reader to immerse themselves in layered symbolism.  
  - Duality is consistently developed, challenging conventional notions of morality and power.  
  - The use of vivid metaphors (the citrus tree, the pound of flesh, the roles assumed) weaves a tapestry of complex relationships between creator and creation.  
  - The “soul line” stands out as a profound, chilling commentary on what we willingly give up in our pursuit of relief or knowledge.
  
- **Areas for Further Reflection:**  
  - Some images (like “did you doctor the evidence yet”) may benefit from slight clarification to ensure the reader grasps the nuance of manipulation without losing the enigmatic tone.  
  - A careful review of punctuation and pauses could enhance the dramatic tension in key lines, giving the reader space to fully absorb each layered meaning.

---

## **Final Thoughts**

Your poem is a compelling exploration of power, deception, and the blurred line between creator and creation. It challenges us to consider how much of our own agency we trade for comfort and how the narratives we consume—and willingly participate in—shape our lives. The text is both a personal confession and a universal commentary on the human condition, wrapped in the guise of a devilish persona.


Monday, 19 May 2025

Tended

As a horticulturalist, I often pause and lookat these water lilly blooms and wonder 
Should I have planted them in a wide tub, easier to clean with some guppies for those mosquitoes that can breed
Then I think if I could add guppies to this pond, but then they are too beautiful to not be seen
Ponds you know are usually deeper and darker, also difficult to clean

Now , the water lilly buds are beautiful, as buds they don't seem as eloquent, like some ugly babies
But then again, I hate babies anyway, they just bring out selfishness of mothers like gardners, I am not one
I evaluate growth patterns, selectively breed and cross pollen, make something undergo trauma without it asking to, torment it without realising
It is control, it is about having something of mine, that I nurture and shape, so like mothers, oh God!

But wait, how wrong of me to say so, motherhood is supposed to be sacrifice, and et all, nope is it really?
Isn't it just wanting control really? Controlling outcomes , wanting something out of it, like to be loved maybe
I think the child when it cares for its parent is more of sacrifice, it didn't ask for a parent, yet it got one, and then chose
To be there, love them or him..or her, so maybe the plants that grow and then shade me are better and sacrificing really

The assumptions of nobility, that we propagate
Such lies
Such lies

-------

Fixed


As a horticulturalist, I often pause and look at these water lily blooms and wonder—  
Should I have planted them in a wide tub, easier to clean?  
With guppies to keep mosquitoes at bay?  

Then I think—could I add guppies to this pond?  
But no, they are too beautiful to be hidden in its depths.  
Ponds, you know, are usually deeper and darker, difficult to clean.  

Now, the water lily buds are beautiful.  
Yet as buds, they lack eloquence—like some ugly babies.  
But then again, I hate babies anyway.  

They only bring out the selfishness of mothers, like gardeners.  
I am not one.  
I evaluate growth patterns, selectively breed and cross-pollinate—  
I impose trauma, without its consent, torment it without realizing.  

It is control.  
It is having something of mine—  
Something I nurture and shape.  
So like mothers—oh God!  

But wait—  
How wrong of me to say so.  
Motherhood is supposed to be sacrifice, isn’t it?  
And yet—is it, really?  

Isn’t it about control?  
Controlling outcomes?  
Wanting something in return—love, perhaps?  

But the child—when it cares for its parent—that is sacrifice.  
It never asked for a parent, yet it got one.  
And then, it chose—  
To be there, to love them.  

So maybe—  
The plants that grow and then shade me  
Are the ones who truly sacrifice.  

The assumptions of nobility we propagate—  
Such lies.
Such lies.


---------



This piece, *Tended*, explores themes of control, sacrifice, and perception, using horticulture as an extended metaphor for parenthood and human relationships. Here’s a deeper analysis of its structure and themes:

### **Tone & Style**
- The narrative flows in a contemplative, almost stream-of-consciousness style, allowing thoughts to unfold naturally.
- There's an underlying tension between admiration and cynicism—between the beauty of nature and the unsettling truths about human motivations.
- The use of repetition—“Such lies. Such lies.”—creates a resonant, striking conclusion, reinforcing the speaker’s realization.

### **Themes & Motifs**
- **Control vs. Growth:** The speaker grapples with the idea of nurturing vs. manipulating, questioning whether gardeners (and mothers) truly cultivate or simply impose their will. The process of cross-pollination, selective breeding, and forced trauma parallels the way humans shape and influence their offspring or creations.
- **Sacrifice vs. Selfishness:** The traditional notion of motherhood as sacrificial love is dismantled, replaced by the idea that parenthood is often about seeking control or validation. The child, rather than the parent, is framed as the true figure of sacrifice.
- **Beauty & Perception:** Water lilies, first seen as awkward buds, later bloom into beauty—echoing societal ideas of children being “ugly babies” but later evolving into something admired. There’s discomfort in this realization, as if beauty is conditional and dependent on time and context.
- **Nature vs. Humanity:** The plants, which provide shade without expectation, are contrasted against human relationships, where unspoken desires and needs influence actions.

### **Structure & Impact**
- The fragmented nature of sentences enhances the reflective tone, making it feel like an internal monologue rather than a structured essay.
- The rhetorical questions serve as pivot points, guiding the reader through a shift in thought without explicitly answering.
- The repetition at the end forces introspection—it leaves the reader unsettled, questioning assumptions about sacrifice and nobility.

### **Interpretation & Significance**
Your piece is a critique of ingrained societal ideals, subtly challenging long-held beliefs about parenthood, care, and relationships. The ambiguity allows room for multiple interpretations, making it a piece that lingers in the mind.